Michal Kaszubski

NeuralTake: one engineer from the first call to the running system

The AI consultancy I founded in London in 2024. It automates manual workflows for professional services firms: a two-week audit, then fixed-fee builds that live in the client’s own repository. I sell, scope, build and support the work.

Years
2024 to present
Category
Products
Role
Founder and AI engineer; discovery, scoping, architecture, delivery, onboarding, support and roadmap
Status
Active; signed B2B contracts delivered end to end. Clients and contract values are not published
Evidence
Commercial validationProduction deployment
Technologies
Python, Django, TypeScript, Next.js, React, PostgreSQL, Anthropic SDK, Stripe, Docker, nginx
Screenshotneuraltake.com, the consultancy’s public site, September 2026: workflow audits and fixed-fee builds for professional services firms.

The problem

Professional services firms run on manual workflows: client onboarding, KYC, document review, CV screening, suitability reports, year-end packs. The firms NeuralTake works for are accountancy and legal practices, recruiters, compliance and advisory firms, financial advisers and insurance brokers. What they are usually offered is a platform to subscribe to. What they need is someone to watch how the work moves, and then replace the part that should not be done by hand.

NeuralTake (Neuraltake Limited) is my consultancy, founded in London in 2024. What it sells is a method and the engineering to carry it out. The method fits in one drawing.

From a thirty-minute call to a workflow the client owns

The method is the one published on neuraltake.com. I run every stage of it myself, so the person who scoped the work is the person who builds it and the person who answers when it misbehaves.

The NeuralTake delivery methodBefore anything is built: First call. Thirty minutes. Is there a workflow here that is worth replacing at all? Workflow audit. Two weeks embedded with the team, watching how the work moves, not how the organisation chart says it does. Ranked punch list. Every process worth automating, ranked by hours saved a week, in writing. The client keeps it either way. The honest no. Some items should be a process change, not software. The list says which, even when that costs the engagement. Fixed scope. One workflow. Scope, price and timeline are agreed before week one. No hourly billing. The build, and after it: Architecture. Designed into the systems the firm already runs: practice management, CRM, documents and email. Build. Two to six weeks from kick-off to the workflow running live. The code lives in the client’s repository. Launch. Deployed on the client’s own infrastructure, inside their data perimeter. There is no platform of mine to depend on. Training. Recorded sessions and plain-English runbooks for the people who own the workflow. Defect cover. Thirty days after launch, anything that misbehaves is fixed free. After that the team owns it outright.Before anything is builtThe build, and after itFirst callThirty minutes. Is there aworkflow here that is worthreplacing at all?Workflow auditTwo weeks embedded with theteam, watching how the workmoves, not how theorganisation chart says itdoes.Ranked punch listEvery process worthautomating, ranked by hourssaved a week, in writing.The client keeps it eitherway.The honest noSome items should be aprocess change, notsoftware. The list sayswhich, even when that coststhe engagement.Fixed scopeOne workflow. Scope, priceand timeline are agreedbefore week one. No hourlybilling.ArchitectureDesigned into the systemsthe firm already runs:practice management, CRM,documents and email.BuildTwo to six weeks fromkick-off to the workflowrunning live. The codelives in the client’srepository.LaunchDeployed on the client’sown infrastructure, insidetheir data perimeter. Thereis no platform of mine todepend on.TrainingRecorded sessions andplain-English runbooks forthe people who own theworkflow.Defect coverThirty days after launch,anything that misbehaves isfixed free. After that theteam owns it outright.The NeuralTake delivery methodBefore anything is built: First call. Thirty minutes. Is there a workflow here that is worth replacing at all? Workflow audit. Two weeks embedded with the team, watching how the work moves, not how the organisation chart says it does. Ranked punch list. Every process worth automating, ranked by hours saved a week, in writing. The client keeps it either way. The honest no. Some items should be a process change, not software. The list says which, even when that costs the engagement. Fixed scope. One workflow. Scope, price and timeline are agreed before week one. No hourly billing. The build, and after it: Architecture. Designed into the systems the firm already runs: practice management, CRM, documents and email. Build. Two to six weeks from kick-off to the workflow running live. The code lives in the client’s repository. Launch. Deployed on the client’s own infrastructure, inside their data perimeter. There is no platform of mine to depend on. Training. Recorded sessions and plain-English runbooks for the people who own the workflow. Defect cover. Thirty days after launch, anything that misbehaves is fixed free. After that the team owns it outright.Before anything is builtThe build, and after itFirst callThirty minutes. Is there a workflow here thatis worth replacing at all?Workflow auditTwo weeks embedded with the team, watching howthe work moves, not how the organisation chartsays it does.Ranked punch listEvery process worth automating, ranked by hourssaved a week, in writing. The client keeps iteither way.The honest noSome items should be a process change, notsoftware. The list says which, even when thatcosts the engagement.Fixed scopeOne workflow. Scope, price and timeline areagreed before week one. No hourly billing.ArchitectureDesigned into the systems the firm alreadyruns: practice management, CRM, documents andemail.BuildTwo to six weeks from kick-off to the workflowrunning live. The code lives in the client’srepository.LaunchDeployed on the client’s own infrastructure,inside their data perimeter. There is noplatform of mine to depend on.TrainingRecorded sessions and plain-English runbooksfor the people who own the workflow.Defect coverThirty days after launch, anything thatmisbehaves is fixed free. After that the teamowns it outright.
SchematicThe NeuralTake engagement, stage by stage, with the durations published on neuraltake.com. Stages only; no client, price or outcome is implied.

What I do

I own every stage in that drawing: stakeholder discovery, scoping, requirements, architecture, delivery, onboarding, support and the roadmap afterwards. Nothing is handed from a salesperson to an analyst to a developer, because they are the same person.

  • I sell the work. NeuralTake has signed B2B contracts and delivered them end to end.
  • I run the audit: two weeks beside the people doing the work, then a ranked list in writing that the firm keeps whether or not it goes further.
  • I design and build the system in the client’s stack, in the client’s repository, on the client’s infrastructure. The site puts it bluntly: fire us tomorrow, nothing breaks.
  • I train the people who will own it, write the runbooks, and cover defects for thirty days after launch.

Two pieces of work show what that produces. AI Zuzi is a client engagement: a social-media and content platform that I engineer for a client company, taken from an inherited prototype to a production system. NeuralKite is my own product: acquisition intelligence for UK private markets, with a mailbox verification engine written at socket level. Each has its own case study, with the engineering in detail.

Nine service lines

The public offer is nine lines. Two are advice, four are builds, two are data work, and one is the handover that makes the rest stick.

Service lineKindWhat is delivered
Automation strategy consultingAdviceEvery workflow that eats staff hours is mapped, then ranked into a phased roadmap: what to automate first, second and third, and why. It includes the plain calls not to automate something.
Workflow auditAdviceTwo weeks embedded, shadowing the people who do the work. The result is a written, evidence-backed punch list, which the firm keeps whether or not it hires NeuralTake.
Fixed-fee pilot projectBuildOne workflow, scoped, priced and shipped in four to six weeks. If it does not justify itself there is no second workflow, and the firm keeps what was built.
Process automationBuildA whole workflow replaced end to end: client onboarding, KYC, document review, CV screening, suitability reports, year-end packs. Live in the client’s stack in two to six weeks.
Custom automation developmentBuildSoftware built into the firm’s practice-management, CRM, document and email tooling. Fixed fee, fixed timeline, fixed scope. The code lives in the client’s repository and runs on the client’s cloud.
AI agents over your documentsBuildRetrieval-augmented agents over engagement letters, playbooks and prior advice, answering with citations and taking multi-step actions, from intake through conflicts and KYC to the engagement letter. They run inside the client’s data perimeter.
Forecasting and capacity analyticsDataOperational forecasts a management team plans around: workload by quarter, utilisation, attrition risk and revenue per matter, built from calendar, billing and time-capture data the firm already holds.
Reporting and management informationDataWork in progress, lock-up, realisation, utilisation, pipeline and win rate, pulled live from practice-management and CRM systems and delivered as dashboards, PDFs or scheduled digests.
Team training and adoptionHandoverRecorded training, plain-English runbooks and thirty days of post-launch defect cover, so the people who own the workflow can run, change and extend it.

The engineering behind it

A small consultancy is only as good as what its founder can build and keep running. This is the stack I work in, with the place each part is in use.

AreaWhat I work inWhere it is in use
Back endsPython: Django 5, Django REST FrameworkTypeScript: Next.js App Router, PrismaAI Zuzi is a Django REST API behind a React single-page app. NeuralKite is a Next.js application with streaming endpoints.
Front endsReact 18, Vite, Tailwind CSS, RadixNext.js, react-i18nextA single-page app in five languages for AI Zuzi; server-rendered React for NeuralKite and for neuraltake.com itself.
Models and agentsAnthropic SDK, OpenAI API, xAI APIretrieval, tool use, structured outputClaude agents that score, research and draft in NeuralKite. Text, vision, assistant threads, image and video generation in AI Zuzi.
DataPostgreSQL, SQLite, Prisma, the Django ORMmigrations, ETL, sequence and key handlingA zero-data-loss live migration from SQLite to PostgreSQL on AI Zuzi. A self-hosted warehouse holding a 2.8-million-company Crunchbase load for NeuralKite.
Identity and paymentsJWT, TOTP and email one-time codes, NextAuthStripe Checkout, webhooks, invoices, billingMulti-factor sign-in and a token economy on AI Zuzi; subscription billing on NeuralKite.
IntegrationsMeta Graph, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Threads, Google Business Profile, WordPressCompanies House, SMTP and DNS at socket levelOAuth connections and publishing services in AI Zuzi. Registry data and a mailbox verification engine in NeuralKite.
SecurityField encryption at restSSRF guards, rate limits, CSP, log redactionStored OAuth tokens in AI Zuzi and stored SMTP passwords in NeuralKite are encrypted before they reach the database. GDPR-aligned deletion with a thirty-day purge on AI Zuzi.
Qualitypytest, GitHub Actions, Sentrystructured audit loggingAI Zuzi deploys from main only when its automated tests and its front-end build pass.

The infrastructure I run

I operate the servers as well as writing the software that runs on them.

LayerWhat I runWhat it is for
ServersA fleet of Ubuntu VPS machinesDocker, Google Cloud RunLong-running applications, databases and mail sit on the VPS fleet; containerised services go to Cloud Run.
Webnginx, Let’s EncryptApache with mod_wsgi where a client already runs itReverse proxying, static sites and TLS certificates. This site is served by the same nginx.
Processespm2 for Node applicationscron for scheduled jobsRestarts on failure, logs, and scheduled jobs such as database backups.
DatabasesSelf-hosted PostgreSQLApplication databases and the Crunchbase warehouse, with dumps taken from the live server.
MailA self-hosted Postal mail serverTransactional and outreach sending with delivery, open, click and bounce events returned by webhook.

Decisions that mattered

Sell the audit before the build
The first paid step is two weeks of watching the work. It produces a ranked list the client owns, and the build that follows is scoped from observation, not from a description of a process given by someone who no longer does it.
Fixed fee, fixed scope, fixed timeline
Scope, price and date are agreed before week one. That puts the risk of the estimate on me, where it belongs, and it forces the scope down to one workflow at a time.
The client owns the code
Everything is built in the client’s repository and deployed on their infrastructure. There is no NeuralTake platform to subscribe to, so nothing stops working if the relationship ends.
Say no in writing
The audit is expected to say which workflows should not be automated. Some problems are a process change, and a punch list that admits it is worth more than one that does not.
One owner from discovery to support
The person who scopes the work also builds it and answers for it afterwards. Requirements do not get lost between roles, and the architecture is chosen by someone who will have to support it.
Run my own infrastructure
Operating servers, databases and a mail server myself is how I know what a deployment costs to keep alive, and it is why the systems I hand over come with runbooks.

Evidence that it works

Signed
B2B contracts, delivered end to endAI software and consultancy work sold, scoped, built and supported under contract through NeuralTake. Stated September 2026. Clients and values are not published.
In production
a client platformAI Zuzi, engineered for a client company through NeuralTake and live at socials.aizuzi.com. Its figures are on its own page.
Live
a product of my ownNeuralKite, publicly accessible at neuralkite.com, checked 15 September 2026. Customer and usage figures are not published.

The consultancy’s own site, neuraltake.com, was live when checked on 15 September 2026. The strongest evidence for the engineering is in the two linked case studies, where the code is described in detail.

Limitations and status

NeuralTake is a small consultancy. I do not name clients, I do not publish contract values or revenue, and I do not give a client count. The hours-saved figures on neuraltake.com describe what the method aims at; this page does not repeat them as results, because I have not published measurements from client engagements. The business is active.

What I learned

Discovery decides whether software gets used. Architecture decides whether it can be supported.

Most of what goes wrong in client software goes wrong before any code is written, in a scope that nobody watched the work to produce. Most of what goes wrong afterwards is a system nobody on the client’s side can run. Doing every stage myself has made me a more careful engineer: I write the runbook knowing I may be the one reading it at a bad moment.

Where to look

neuraltake.com (opens in a new tab) is the consultancy’s public site. The engineering is in the AI Zuzi case study and the NeuralKite case study. Client work beyond what those pages describe is confidential and is not shown.